Legal Opinion

State v. Sears

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 25, 1984No. J83-0655; CA A29450PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a forged instrument, contending that the trial court erred in refusing to grant his motion to suppress certain evidence. The sole issue is whether the search of a manila envelope in which defendant’s personal property was placed when he was booked into jail after his arrest on a different charge seven weeks earlier constitutes a lawful search incident to arrest. Because we hold that it does not, we reverse and remand.

On February 9, 1983, defendant was stopped for a traffic violation. He was unable to produce a driver’s license but, when asked…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. ChinnOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. AddicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BarnumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. BarnumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API