Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Crawford Door Sales

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1993No. C1-93-220PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAGE, Justice.

Certiorari was granted to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirming the compensation judge’s determination that Kenneth Hunter, claimant-relator, was an independent contractor.1 We reverse.

Crawford Door Sales is in the business of selling and installing garage doors and the door openers. Crawford Door had a number of regular employees who were provided uniforms, company trucks, and tools. When there was an overload of work, Crawford Door hired “subcontractors,” individuals whom they would train and dispatch on a per-job basis as needed.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Hammes v. SukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Edelston v. Builders and Remodelers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Olsen v. KlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Palmquist v. MeisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Jerald Meyer v. Duluth Building Trades Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  4. Hix v. Minnesota Workers' Compensation Assigned Risk PlanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Bastian v. Carlton County Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API