Legal Opinion

Mardorf v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1937No. 31,095PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial in a personal injury action.

On May 7, 1933, plaintiff ivas injured by being struck by one of defendant’s streetcars. This is the fourth time that this case has been before this court. It is reported in 192 Minn. 230, 255 N. W. 809; 194 Minn. 537, 261 N. W. 177; and 196 Minn. 347, 265 N. W. 32. In the trial now being reviewed plaintiff received a verdict of $1,500. The facts, except as hereinafter indicated, are fully set forth in the former opinions. Anyone…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Mardorf v. Duluth-Superior Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Minnesota Land & Immigration Co. v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Block v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Hohman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Radermacher v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Fenton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Gillson v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Fieve v. EmmeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API