Railroad Commission of Texas v. City of Austin
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion
ON REHEARING
2DissentPope, Justice
In my opinion, the courts below have correctly decided this case and the Railroad Commission had jurisdiction to entertain the petition. In fact the majority, while reversing those judgments, makes direct holdings that the Commission has jurisdiction over the gas controlled by the two public utilities, Lo-Vaca and TUFCO. The court expressly holds that the Commission has power:
“to allocate Lo-Vaca’s gas among cities, towns and corporations, and is already doing so.
“to allocate TUFCO’s gas, and the gas of all other gas utilities among cities, towns and corporations.
“to deal with the…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Gibbs v. Consolidated Gas Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- State ex rel. Caster v. Kansas Postal-Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. Municipal Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. EdgarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.