Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Lowrie

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Rule for a Preliminary Injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

The fraudulent disposition of his property by Lowrie, the bankrupt, is manifest, and so is the complicity of the defendants therein. Goods sold by different manufacturers to Lowrie, in Buffalo, N. Y., are traced into the possession of Ike Joseph, his former partner, and Moses Hendler, an associate and friend, of Forest City, Pa., and Aaron Schwartz, of Scranton— some through the so-called firm of G. Mitchell & Co., some through Morris Schwartz, a brother of Aaron, who was in the employ of Lowrie, and some from Lowrie direct. No doubt — on the question of identity —…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Pond v. New York National Exch. BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
  3. Gregory v. AtkinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1904
  4. Johnston v. Forsyth Mercantile Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Bankers' Commercial Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1930
  2. Prescott v. GalluccioDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1908
  3. Teague v. Anderson Hardware Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API