Legal Opinion
Hartnett v. Chase Bank of Texas National Ass'n
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided August 10, 1999No. 4:98-cv-01061PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LINSAY, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed October 1, 1998. Upon careful consideration of the motion, response, reply, record evidence, and applicable law, the court, for the reasons that follow, grants Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Plaintiff James Hartnett began his career with one of Defendants’ 1 predecessor banks in 1972. 2 This bank eventually be came Texas Commerce Bank (“TCB”). Up until 1990, Plaintiff served as a consumer loan officer, which entailed taking loan…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ragas v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eber v. Harris County Hospital DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001