Legal Opinion
People v. Warrington
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 2016PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the case remitted to the Appellate Division for consideration of the facts and issues raised but not determined on appeal to that Court.
We agree with the People that the Appellate Division erred in concluding that the trial court was required to excuse prospective juror No. 383 for cause (see 130 AD3d 1368, 1371 [3d Dept 2015]). During voir dire, defense counsel asked prospective jurors whether “[a]nybody [had] a problem with the fact [that the case involved] the death of a five year old child.”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. ChambersNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. BlydenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. AcostaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- People v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- People v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. WarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.