Legal Opinion

People v. Chambers

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 2002PublishedCited by 207 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree. The sole issue on appeal is whether a prospective juror should have been excused for cause after acknowledging during voir dire that in his view, “trained police officers are good observers” and that he “would tend to believe police testimony to some degree.” The following colloquy occurred:

“[defense counsel]: I just want to be sure a juror isn’t going to give [police] testimony any more weight than anyone else. Are you telling me you would do that?
“[prospective juror] : I would try not to let it…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. BlydenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. BludsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. People v. MartellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

4Cited by207 opinions

  1. People v. LaValleNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. People v. ShulmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. People v. NicholasNew York Court of Appeals · 2002

202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API