In Re Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOTT BRISTER, Chief Justice.
Twice in the last ten years the Supreme Court of Texas has granted the extraordinary writ of mandamus in circumstances just like those here. Both times, the Court intervened in asbestos litigation when the trial court compelled discovery relating to products the plaintiffs never used for time periods they were not employed. See In re American Optical Corp., 988 S.W.2d 711, 713 (Tex.1998); Texaco, Inc. v. Sanderson, 898 S.W.2d 813, 815 (Tex.1995). In this asbestos discovery dispute, the trial court compelled discovery relating to products the plaintiff never…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re CSX Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re American Optical Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Texaco, Inc. v. SandersonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Alford Chevrolet-GeoTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Exmark Manufacturing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
- In Re Memorial Hermann Healthcare System, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Hernandez v. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels & FriendCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- In Re Merck & Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- in Re Platinum Energy Solutions, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.