Lee v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
At Raw. Action by R. M. Ree against the Kansas City Southern Railway Company. On motion by defendant to set aside verdict and grant a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
YOUMANS, District Judge.
There are two points in defendant's motion for a new trial which demand investigation: (1) The objection to certain testimony given by expert neurologists; and (2) the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.
The plaintiff alleges in his complaint that he sustained an injury in a collision on the defendant’s road on the 22d day of September, 1909; while he was a passenger on one of its passenger trains. He *766introduced testimony tending to show that he is now, as a result of the injury sustained in that collision, suffering from a nervous disease called…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Greinke v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Roosa v. Boston Loan Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Quaife v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gulf Refining Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
- United States v. NickleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Waldroop v. Driver-Miller Plumbing & Heating Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Ben M. Hogan Company, Inc. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.