Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1982No. 49437, 51505Published

1DissentPeterson, Justice

In reversing defendant's conviction for first-degree murder, the majority of the court departs from the traditional “probability” standard for determining whether newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial, adopts the Larrison “possibility” rule and applies the rule in circumstances where it has never before been applied by any state or federal court. I disagree with the ultimate decision to reverse defendant’s conviction and the manner in which the majority arrives at its decision. The majority fails to explain why the traditional rule is inadequate in these circumstances, why it chooses…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  4. People v. . ShilitanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. United States v. George StofskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API