Legal Opinion
Day v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided October 24, 1995No. 4:CV94-3193PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PIESTER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Filing 39). For the reasons set forth below, I shall grant the motion with respect to plaintiffs constitutional and age discrimination claims and dismiss his state based contract claim for want of jurisdiction. 1
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Dr. Victor Day, is employed as a professor in the Chemistry Department at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and is a resident of Nebraska. (Amended Complaint at ¶ 4; Answer to Amended Complaint at ¶ 1). The defendant Board of…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sack v. North Carolina State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Cunningham v. Kansas City Star Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1998
- Temple v. Inhabitants of the City of BelfastDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1998
- Wieland v. City of ArnoldDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2000
- Day v. Board of Regents of the University of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.