Legal Opinion

Means v. Terrell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1932No. 21002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKornegay, J.

The facts out of which ' the controversy arose are that a Choctaw Indian woman, enrolled as a fuli-blood,’ and having only full-blood heirs, died intestate in Haskell county, Okla., on March 21, 1923, having allotted lands, part in section 20, township 10 north, range 22 east, and part in section 1, township 9 north, range 21 east. One of the heirs, Cephus W. Scott, here made a defendant in error, mortgaged his interest in the land in section 20 to plaintiff in error for $400, which mortgage was approved by .the county court April 7, 192S. This mortgage was not placed of record in Haskell…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Terrell v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Furst v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Stephens v. MaxeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API