Renker v. Village of Brooklyn
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
The first cláím of the plaintiff is that this ordinance has been repealed by implication inasmuch as the council of the village subsequently adopted a zoning ordinance. However, this court finds no basis for such a procedural inference, especially in view of the fact that the council has amended the trailer camp ordinance twice since the adoption of the zoning ordinance.
The substantive claim of the plaintiff is that the amended trailer camp ordinance is unconstitutional in that it has' no relation to the public health, morals or welfare and that it is unreasonable, discriminatory and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Spitler v. Town of MunsterIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by7 opinions
- Napierkowski v. Township of GloucesterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Lower Merion Township v. GallupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Corning v. Town of OntarioNew York Supreme Court · 1953
- Gillam v. Board of Health of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Rezler v. Village of RiversideIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.