Evans v. Brown Et Ux.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by W. F. Evans against C. S. Brown and' wife. By cross-petition the St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad Company was made party defendant. Judgment for Brown and wife, and plaintiff and the railroad company bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
KANE, J:
This was a suit commenced by L. E. Parker, and afterward revived in the name of W. F. Evans, the plaintiff in error, against the defendants in error, to reform a deed 'to a certain piece of real estate. The parties hereafter will be designated plaintiffs and defendants as they were designated in the court below. By way of answer and cross-petition the defendant C. S. Brown set up fraud on the part of his agent who negotiated the sale of the realty out of which the controversy arose, and prayed that the deed sought to be reformed be canceled and his title to the land cleared. Upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. HamlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Ferguson & Fries v. GoochSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- Hunter Realty Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Henderson v. VincentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Donovan v. CampionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. LimaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bruce J. Frey v. Fraser Yachts David Fraser, Inc. Budel, Inc. C-Bench Investments, Inc. Carnor, Inc. And Norman McCarvillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Home Insurance Co. v. Southern Motor Coach Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Great American Ins. Co. v. Farmers' Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Quest v. BargeSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.