Boyd v. Spring Creek Condominium Assn., 08 Ca 00009 (5-6-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellants, Jonwade and Judith Boyd, appeal a judgment of the Fairfield County Common Pleas Court finding the arbitration clause in their condominium declaration to be binding and staying their action in the Common Pleas Court pending arbitartion. Defendant-appellee is Spring Creek Condominium Association.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND CASE
{¶ 2} Appellants own a condominium unit in Spring Creek Condominiums. Appellants represent that they purchased their condominium unit due in part to the Condominium Association's Declaration which stated that twenty-five percent (25%) of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Kelm v. KelmOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Teramar Corp. v. Rodier Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Small v. Hcf of Perrysburg, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Fortune v. Castle Nursing Homes, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Villas Di Tuscany Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Villas Di TuscanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014