Legal Opinion

Uhrig v. Crane Creek Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1927No. 4708PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEATHERSTONE, Commissioner.

The plaintiff, Paul Uhrig, brought suit in .the nature of an action to quiet title, and defendants filed an answer and cross-complaint asking that title to the disputed premises be quieted in them. The court found for the defendants and plaintiff appeals.

The record shows that in 1908 Edwin D. Ford and the Crane Creek Irrigation Land & Power Company applied to the United States for a right of way for reservoir purposes over certain lands in township 12 north, range 2 west, Boise Meridian, in Washington county, Idaho. The filings were approved and thereupon the maps…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Seybold Mach. Co. v. FeehanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  3. United States v. WhitneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1910
  4. Hurst v. Idaho Iowa Lateral & Reservoir Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Carns v. Idaho-Iowa Lateral & Reservoir Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coulsen v. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER, ETC. v. BerglandDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  3. Wiltbank v. Lyman Water CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API