Moudy v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dady
Plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for $5,000 for injuries resulting from a collision between his automobile and defendant’s passenger train. Defendant appeals.
The charges of negligence were that defendant negligently permitted weeds and shrubs to grow on its right of way so that plaintiff in approaching the crossing in question was unable to see the approaching train, and that defendant ran its train on the crossing without blowing a whistle or sounding a bell as required by statute.
The first contention of the defendant is that the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dee v. City of PeruIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Frazer v. HoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Grubb v. Illinois Terminal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Ziraldo v. W. J. Lynch Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1936
- McClure v. Hoopeston Gas & Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berg v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
- Supergear Drive Corp. v. Hollister-Whitney Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945