Legal Opinion

Williams v. Warden

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1979No. Docket 77-3555PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Maher, J.

Plaintiff, an inmate of the Michigan Reformatory at Ionia, brings this original action for mandamus, seeking to compel the defendant warden to restore 7 months, 26 days of good time previously forfeited by order of the warden. We hold that plaintiffs good time was improperly forfeited, and that mandamus should issue.

Plaintiff was twice accused of assault upon another inmate, and was twice found guilty in .prison disciplinary proceedings. Following each incident plaintiffs accumulated good time was ordered forfeited by the warden, as recommended by the disciplinary officers. Plaintiff contends…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Pfefferle v. Corrections CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Heyman v. KroppMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Floyd Spruytte v. Richard Walters and Ronald SchinkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. West Bloomfield Hospital v. Certificate of Need BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Butler v. WardenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Jerome v. Crime Victims Compensation BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Floyd Spruytte v. Richard Walters and Ronald SchinkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API