Legal Opinion

Leventhal v. Spillman

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 29, 1964No. 60 C 899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, District Judge.

The plaintiff trustee in bankruptcy sues to set aside as fraudulent the bankrupt’s conveyance in bulk to a newly formed corporation, all the stock of which was acquired by his wife, of all his business assets in return for the corpora tion’s agreement to pay the bankrupt’s business debts but none of the bankrupt’s numerous other creditors. The principal defenses are that the conveyance as a bulk “sale” was perfected in compliance with the Bulk Sales Act (former New York Personal Property Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 41, § 44) and that the transfer was not fraudulent…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Dean v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. White v. CotzhausenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Billings v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Leitch v. . HollisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. Barney v. . GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1849

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pereira v. Checkmate Communications Co. (In Re Checkmate Stereo & Electronics, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  2. United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1987
  3. Fleet v. Rhode (In Re Fleet)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Flushing Savings Bank v. ParrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Petersen v. VallenzanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API