Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. Sams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
(xriffiN Smith, C. J.
On a jury’s finding that ap-pellee was totally disabled within the meaning of insurance policies which he carried in appellant company, judgment for $1,250 was rendered. As grounds for reversal appellant urges two propositions: (1) That if appellee is disabled to any degree by reason of a dilated heart and arterio-sclerosis, such disability, was contributed to by appellee’s own intemperate use of alcoholic liquors; and (2) that appellee is not totally and permanently disabled within the provisions of the beneficiary certificates sued on.
There are ten assignments of error,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Ætna Life Insurance v. PhiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Travelers' Protective Assoc. of America v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Missouri State Life Insurance v. SnowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lyle v. Reliance Life Insurance Co. of Pittsburg, Pa.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Union Life Insurance Company v. PritchettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945