Legal Opinion
Merando, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 16, 1973No. 807-71PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge
In this government contract case, the court is being asked by cross motions for summary judgment to review a decision1 of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the Board) pursuant to the Wunderlich Act, 41 TJ.S.C. §§321-22 (1970).
In issue is whether the contract language was clear enough to give the contractor an unambiguous representation of the method of pouring concrete. Only the question of entitlement is presently before this court, the parties having stipulated to leave the question of quantum for further proceedings.
We hold that the Board was correct as a matter of law when it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Telephone & Telegraph v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Northwestern Industrial Piping, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Embassy Moving & Storage Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Hrh Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Embassy Moving & Storage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- George Hyman Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- California Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- George Hyman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- William F. Klingensmith, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Avedon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.