Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 28, 1920No. A-3384PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

It is first contended that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the information. It is contended in this court that the information does not state facts sufficient to charge the defendant with the crime of carrying concealed weapons. The charging part of the information is as follows:

“The said J. J. Shepherd, then and there being, did then and there willfully and unlawfully carry on and about his person a certain concealed weapon, to wit, a certain 44-calibre, new service, Colt revolver, contrary,” etc.

In the case of State v. Jones, 3 Okla. Cr. 412, 106 Pac. 351, an information…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Koontz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Penn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Ex Parte ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Ex Parte ThomasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. State v. JordanIdaho Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HartIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Liddell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Booth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Lyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API