Legal Opinion
State v. Speers
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 7, 1989No. 6385; 6738PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The defendants, Thomas W. Speers and William George,1 appeal from judgments of conviction following their conditional pleas of nolo contendere2 to the crimes of gambling and professional gambling in violation of General Statutes § 53-278b (a) and (b)3 and *589transmitting or receiving gambling information by telephone in violation of General Statutes § 53-278d (a). 4 They claim the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress evidence obtained through a wiretap investigation, and their motion to dismiss the charges against them, (1) by determining that the defendants did not prove that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Richmond v. LongoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Chouinard v. MarjaniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. LucaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Plikus v. PlikusConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.