Legal Opinion

Rhymer v. Federal Life Ins.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided January 8, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

The petition in this case alleges that on January 1, 1931, the defendant, Federal Life Insurance Company, entered into an insurance contract known as “Group Policy No. 1122” with the Harlan Star Coal Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Kentucky and then engaged in operating certain coal mines in this state. The pertinent provisions of the insurance contract are as follows:

“Part I
“Formula and Schedule of Indemnity
“A — This insurance covers all employees of the Assured for death resulting within two (2) years, from injuries received by accident arising out of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. CravensSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Greene v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Workmen's Compensation Board v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. Standard Acc. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  2. Federal Life Insurance v. RhymerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  3. Michael Bruce Anthony McPherson v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API