Legal Opinion

Bollam v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 1985No. A8004-02314 CAA27608Published

1Opinion of the Court

709 P.2d 1095 (1985)

76 Or.App. 267

Louis W. BOLLAM and Elaine H. Bollam, Respondents-Cross-Appellants,

v.

FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

A8004-02314; CAA27608.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted April 6, 1984.

Decided November 14, 1985.

Resubmitted December 11, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied January 10, 1986.

Gary V. Abbott, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on briefs were Hallmark, Griffith & Keating, Portland,

Stephen R. Frank, Portland, argued the cause for respondents-cross-appellants.…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. O'Malley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Jaquith v. FerrisOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Industrial Chrome Platino Co. v. NorthOregon Supreme Court · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API