Joint County Park Board v. Stegemoller
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Emmert, J.
Appellees in their petition for rehearing assert that by the language of the original opinion to the effect that the sixth objection pleaded matters in abatement which were waived by being joined with other objections which, if anything, were answers in bar, there was added “something new” to the law in eminent domain cases, and that by implication, for the first time, the cases of Morrison v. Indianapolis & Western R. Co. (1906), 166 Ind. 511, 76 N. E. 961, 77 N. E. 744, and Vandalia Coal Co. v. Indianapolis & Louisville Rwy. Co. (1907), 168 Ind. 144, 79 N.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. MichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Morrison v. Indianapolis & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Gaar, Scott & Co. v. FleshmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joint County Park Board v. StegemollerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949