Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sills

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1890No. 14,042PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The appellee declared upon a promissory note, and the appellant pleaded by way of set-off that the appellee was indebted to him upon a promissory note and a judgment in a sum exceeding the amount due on the note on which the complaint is founded. The appellee replied that he was a resident householder of the State, that he had less property than the law exempts from execution, and that he claimed the note in suit as exempt from execution under the statute. The reply was held good on demurrer.

Our decisions settle the question in favor of the appellee, for they adjudge that the maker of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Puett v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Junker v. HustesIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Butner v. BowserIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Burdge v. BolinIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Carpenter v. CoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fiscus v. FiscusIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Wagner v. J. H. North Furniture & Carpet Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Grant v. Phoenix-Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Coffing v. DunganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Coffing v. DunganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API