Legal Opinion

Calvert v. PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 23, 1963No. 11118, 11119Published

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Justice.

These cases were filed and briefed separately, however they were submitted and argued together, present the same questions, consequently we will determine the issues in one opinion.

This is an appeal by the Comptroller of Public Accounts, the Attorney General and the Treasurer of the State of Texas from a judgment of the District Court declaring the Dedicated Reserve Tax Act, Article 3.11 of Title 122A, Vernon’s Ann.Rev.Civ.St. to be unconstitutional and void for the reasons that the tax levied by the Act is prohibited by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Currin v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Nippert v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. CalvertSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. LordSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API