Legal Opinion

Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 23, 1956No. 910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. SKELLY WRIGHT, District Judge.

In prior proceedings in this case,1 respondent has been held liable for the value of the Steel Tank Barge Bisso No. 9 on the date of her loss, May 12, 1944. The Commissioner’s report on valuation of this vessel at the time of the loss has been filed.2 He finds that the vessel had a reproduction cost of $31,000, to which he added $7,350 charter hire, contracted for but not earned by the vessel at the time of the loss, making a total valuation of $38,350, from which he subtracted the barge’s salvage value following the casualty of $1,800, thus arriving at a net…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Ozanic v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Carl Sawyer, Inc. v. Poor the Monarch of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alamo Barge Lines, Inc. v. Rim Maritime Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1984
  2. Lowery v. The Tug Ellen S. BouchardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API