Legal Opinion

Monaco v. Queen Insurance Co. of America

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1925No. Appeals 162 and 163Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter., J.,

These are actions of assumpsit on policies of insurance upon automobiles, in which the plaintiffs seek to recover for damage by fire caused to their respective cars. The policies were indentical in form, the material facts involved were precisely similar, the cases were tried together in the court below, the appeals present but a single question and may be prop erly disposed of by one opinion. One of the warranties in each of the policies, on the faith of which it was issued, was that the actual cost to the insured of the automobile, including equipment, ivas $3600.00.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benvenuto v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Puro v. Franklin Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API