Puro v. Franklin Fire Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
It is not necessary for us to pass in detail upon the twenty-two assignments of error filed in this appeal or to review at length the various rulings upon evidence of the court below which are objected to here; for the reason that the plaintiff’s own undisputed testimony justified the trial court in giving binding instructions in favor of the defendant, and'his offers of evidence, to which objections were sustained, if admitted, would not have changed the situation.
The action was in assumpsit upon a policy of insurance insuring the plaintiff in the sum of $600 against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldberg v. Knickerbocker Ins. Co. of N.Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Sitler v. Spring Garden Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Benvenuto v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- State Mutual Fire Insurance v. ArthurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Smith v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schloss v. Importers & Exporters InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Kiefer v. Girard Fire & Marine Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Monaco v. Queen Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925