Legal Opinion

Chappell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 9-08-43 (2-9-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2009No. 9-08-43PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellant, Dianna Chappell, appeals from the judgment of the Marion County Court of Common Pleas, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. On appeal, Chappell argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Wal-Mart, as genuine issues of material fact exist on the question of whether her injuries arose out of her employment with Wal-Mart, thereby entitling her to workers' compensation benefits. Finding there to be no genuine issue of material fact, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

{¶ 2} In May 2007,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Horton v. Harwick Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Byrd v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schnipke v. Safe-Turf Installation Group, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. White v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API