Legal Opinion

Tamarin Lindenberg v. Jackson Nat'l Life Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 28, 2019No. 17-6034/6079PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court received petitions for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petitions for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petitions were fully considered upon the original submission and decision. The petitions then were circulated to the full court. Less than a majority of the judges voted in favor of rehearing en banc.

Therefore, the petitions are denied.

CONCURRENCE

2ConcurrenceClay, Circuit Judge

It is incredulous that some of my colleagues would have this Court establish rigid, mechanical, and unflinching criteria for certification to state courts in lieu of our established practice of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Church Joint Venture, L.P. v. Earl BlasingameCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Evoqua Water Techs. v. M.W. WatermarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Benjamin Franklin Franchising SPE LLC v. David Michael Plumbing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  4. Republic Services of Indiana v. Coe Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API