Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Varner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 21, 1990No. 88-1416PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

Our opinion of February 9, 1990, is withdrawn and the following opinion substituted therefor.

We issued the writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals to review the issue whether the 10-day period for appeal provided in Ala. Code 1975, § 25-4-95, or the 30-day period for appeal provided in § 41-22-20 governs this case. The Court of Civil Appeals, following its reasoning in Mays v.Sabel Steel Services, Inc., 500 So.2d 467 (Ala.Civ.App. 1986), applied the 10-day statute, and thus held that the appeal, which was filed on the 30th day, was untimely. (Judge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. SHPDA v. AMI Brookwood Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Mays v. Sabel Steel Services, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dees v. Department of Industrial RelationsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Hilley v. General Motors Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  5. Target Corp. v. Jefferson County Board of EqualizationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API