Ex Parte General Motors Corporation
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
I respectfully dissent because the Legislature has reenacted § 25-4-95, Ala. Code 1975, without material change,2 1995 Ala. Act No. 95-311, p. 582, § 2, p. 608, since Director of StateDep't of Indus. Relations v. Nolin, 374 So.2d 903 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979), Cruce v. Demarco Concrete Block Co. and State of AlabamaDep't of Indus. Relations, 380 So.2d 900 (Ala.Civ.App. 1980), and Security Engineers, Inc. v. Anderson, 421 So.2d 1298 (Ala.Civ.App. 1982), were decided and has thereby manifested legislative intent in accord with the holdings of those cases that the requirementsof § 25-4-95 are…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Lancaster v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- State v. StoutCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Hamm v. HarriganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- DIRECTOR OF STATE DEPT. OF IND. REL. v. NolinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.