Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1981No. Grand Jury 81-199-2Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GILES, District Judge.

Petitioner received a grand-jury subpoena to produce handwriting samples. He now asks that I reconsider an order enforcing the subpoena. Because his objections are meritorious, the order will be stayed.

Petitioner argues that he need not answer the subpoena because the government has failed to comply with 18 U.S.C. § 3504(a)(1). 1 Under that section, when a grand-jury witness claims that evidence was obtained through an act of unlawful surveillance, the government must “affirm or deny the occurrence of the alleged unlawful act.” 2 An insufficient denial entitles…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Nicholas D'AnDreACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. In the Matter of Grand Jury Impaneled January 21, 1975. Appeal of Abraham E. FreedmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. In the Matter of Zoia HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. WeinerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. In re Grand Jury Proceedings, YuchDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API