Legal Opinion
Northen v. Mary Anne Frolick & Associates
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 4, 1998No. A98A0921PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Harold R. Banke.
Mary Anne Frolick & Associates, d/b/a Re/Max Achievers (“Re/ Max”) sued Arthur J. Northen, Jr. to recover a real estate commission after Northen breached a contractual obligation to purchase a $3.2 million residence. Re/Max’s complaint had two counts, one for breach of contract and one for attorney fees based on bad faith and stubborn *805litigiousness.
After experiencing some discovery difficulties, Re/Max filed a motion to compel and for sanctions. Based upon a determination that Northen “completely failed to respond to Plaintiff’s Second Request for Production of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sevcech v. Ingles Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Caswell v. CaswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Jones v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
3Cited by10 opinions
- SOTTER v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Jones v. Peach Trader Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- American Medical Security Group, Inc. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- American Medical Security Group, Inc. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Anthony R. Hamby v. Earl PayneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.