Legal Opinion

Peay v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court in Chancery. Hon. George W. Beazley, Circuit Judge. In Duncan et al. vs. Biscoe et al., 2 Eng. Rep. 175, this Court decided this, and no more than this: that the naked stock mortgage was no statutory, or legal security, for moneys borrowed from the bank by a stockholder. That is all that can be made of that decision — utterly and radically wrong as it was even to that extent.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court in Chancery. Hon. George W. Beazley, Circuit Judge. In Duncan et al. vs. Biscoe et al., 2 Eng. Rep. 175, this Court decided this, and no more than this: that the naked stock mortgage was no statutory, or legal security, for moneys borrowed from the bank by a stockholder. That is all that can be made of that decision — utterly and radically wrong as it was even to that extent. Wilson vs. Biscoe et al., 6 Eng. 44. Now it so happens that a mere statute mortgage is not the only means whereby a party can obtain a lien on real estate for the security of money,…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice English

This was a bill to foreclose a mortgage, filed in the Monroe Circuit Court, 23d June, 1848. The original complainants were Henry L. Biscoe, Sandford C. Faulkner, and others, residuary Trustees of the Real Estate Bank, under the deed of assignment. In the progress of the cause it was shown that, by an order of the Chancery Court for Pulaski county, the Trustees had been removed, and the assets of the Bank placed under the management of Gordon N. Peay, as Receiver, and he was substituted as complainant in the bill.

The defendants were William B. Duncan, Francis Surget, John Ker, Alfred Mullins,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mason v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Lewis v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Crittenberger v. Farmers & Merchants National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Blackwell Oil & Gas Co. v. MadduxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. United States v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API