Legal Opinion

Chickering v. Yates

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 3, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Mabel Chickering appeals from an order of the Superior Court denying her the relief she requested under 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 6651 — 54 (Summary Proceedings to Quiet Title) and dismissing her complaint. 1 We affirm the judgment.

The case before us presents a record of procedural, nightmare. On at least two occasions the case reached the state of scheduled jury trial without either party recognizing the necessity for a preliminary order by the court sitting without jury under 14 M.R.S.A. § 6654. That section provides in part: “The court shall make such decree respecting the bringing and prosecuting of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hodgdon v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Clouston v. ShearerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Sargent v. CoolidgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Marshall v. WalkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1900
  5. Boston Manufacturing Co. v. BurginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Colquhoun v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Tozier v. TozierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Lewien v. CohenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. McGrath v. HillsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. James N. Levis v. Gustav KonitzkySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API