Chickering v. Yates
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Per curiam
Mabel Chickering appeals from an order of the Superior Court denying her the relief she requested under 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 6651 — 54 (Summary Proceedings to Quiet Title) and dismissing her complaint. 1 We affirm the judgment.
The case before us presents a record of procedural, nightmare. On at least two occasions the case reached the state of scheduled jury trial without either party recognizing the necessity for a preliminary order by the court sitting without jury under 14 M.R.S.A. § 6654. That section provides in part: “The court shall make such decree respecting the bringing and prosecuting of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hodgdon v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Clouston v. ShearerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Sargent v. CoolidgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Marshall v. WalkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1900
- Boston Manufacturing Co. v. BurginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colquhoun v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Tozier v. TozierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Lewien v. CohenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- McGrath v. HillsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- James N. Levis v. Gustav KonitzkySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.