Legal Opinion
McCormack v. Township of Clinton
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 3, 1994No. Civ. 94-4510 (GEB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BROWN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the application of plaintiff pro se, Brian McCor-mack, for an Order of this Court preliminarily enjoining defendant from enforcing Clinton Township Ordinance No. 552-94, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant plaintiffs application for preliminary injunctive relief.
I. BACKGROUND
On June 23, 1994, the Clinton Township Council adopted Ordinance No. 552-94, which provides in relevant part:
(A) Political: Any sign supporting any particular candidate, candidates party, etc., in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Central Radio Company Inc. v. City of NorfolkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Knoeffler v. Town of MamakatingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- City of Painesville Building Department v. Dworken & Bernstein Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- Thomas v. SchroerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Curry v. Prince George's County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.