Legal Opinion

Cathexis Ventures, LP v. mIQroTech, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided January 28, 2025No. 8:21-cv-02823Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION CATHEXIS VENTURES, LP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 8:21-cv-2823-KKM-TGW MIQROTECH, INC., and MEADE LEWIS Defendants. ___________________________________ ORDER “[W]hen considering a motion to terminate a civil contempt order, ‘the district court must make an individualized determination as to whether there exists a realistic possibility that the contemnor will [comply].’ ” , 950 F.2d 1525, 1530–31 (11th Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (alteration in the original) (quoting ,

877 F.2d 849, 850

(11th Cir. 1989) (per curiam)). e…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morris Simkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the State of Florida v. Wellington Precious Metals, Inc., Daniel WeissCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Edilberto Mendoza-AcevedoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Joseph HowaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API