Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Joseph Howald

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 26, 1989No. 89-5522PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Joseph Howald appeals from the denial of his motion for release from civil contempt for his failure to testify before Grand Jury 87-4 in Miami. Howald was subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury on November 8, 1988 but refused. The district court granted Howald statutory use immunity under 18 U.S.C. § 6003 on January 18, 1989. Because Howald still refused to testify, the district court held him in civil contempt that same day. On May 10, 1989, Howald filed a motion for release from confinement for civil contempt. After a hearing at which Howald testified, the district court denied that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Morris Simkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of Joseph Braun, WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Ramon Saul Sanchez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the State of Florida v. Wellington Precious Metals, Inc., Daniel WeissCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. BirchallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings Empanelled May 1988. Appeal of Dennis FrelighCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. In the Matter of Harold F. Younger, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Cathexis Ventures, LP v. mIQroTech, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API