Legal Opinion

Durgan v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided May 17, 2006No. 09-04-501-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.

This is a plea-bargain case in which the trial court revoked Nakeesha Durgaris community supervision and sentenced her *886to ten years in prison. Durgan raises five appellate issues. We find we have no jurisdiction over issues one, three, and four. We overrule issues two and five and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Background

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Durgan pled guilty to a third-degree felony, namely, delivery of cocaine in an amount of less than one gram, within 1,000 feet of a school. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (b) (Vernon…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Rylander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Manuel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hergert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006
  2. In re Commitment of BohannanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Durgan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006
  4. Durgan, NakeeshaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Hergert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API