Legal Opinion
In re Commitment of Bohannan
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 22, 2010No. 09-09-00165-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.
A jury determined that Michael Wayne Bohannan is a sexually violent predator *295under Texas law. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 841.001-.150 (Vernon 2010) (SVP statute). The jury found that Bohannan suffers from a behavioral abnormality that predisposes him to engage in a predatory act of sexual violence. Bohan-nan presents seven issues in his appeal from the trial court’s judgment and order of civil commitment. In issue three, Bo-hannan complains that the trial court erred in excluding his sole expert witness. Because we find the trial court erred…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Broders v. HeiseTexas Supreme Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- in Re Commitment of Michael BohannanTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Bohannan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Bohannan, Michael WayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Michael Wayne Bohannan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2014
- in Re Commitment of Michael Wayne Bohannan, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.