Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rowry v. University of Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1992No. Docket Nos. 91292, 91293, (Calendar No. 2)Published

1ConcurrenceGriffin, J.

Reluctantly, I concur in the result reached by the majority. I write separately to express my concern that application of a limitation period of six years, rather than six months, will seriously undermine state and federal policies favoring the prompt resolution of labor disputes.

In its analysis, the majority concludes that the six-year period generally applicable to contract actions1 is the appropriate limitation period to apply to this plaintiff’s action to "enforce” a labor *13arbitration award. However, this case involves more than a simple breach of contract or a straightforward refusal to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United Mine Workers, District 4 v. Cyprus Emerald Resources Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Walkerville Education Ass'n v. Walkerville Rural Communities SchoolMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API