Legal Opinion
Hoffman Plstcs v. NLRB
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 16, 2001No. 19-1071PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
237 F.3d 639 (D.C. Cir. 2001)
Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc., Petitioner
v.
National Labor Relations Board, Respondent
No. 98-1570
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Argued En Banc September 27, 2000
Decided January 16, 2001
On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board
Maurice Baskin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Ryan D. McCortney.
Sharon Block, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Leonard R. Page, General…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jose Raimundo Madeira v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc., and Mountain Developers Associates, Llc, Defendants-Third-Party-Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Preferred National Insurance Co., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee v. Cleidson C. Silva, Doing Business as C & L Construction, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tarango v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Virginia Duncan v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025