Legal Opinion
Teamster Local Union No. 182 ex rel. Vohid v. Upper Mohawk Valley Regional Water Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 31, 1999No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Respondent instituted a disciplinary proceeding against its employee, petitioner Abdul Vohid, based upon charges of misconduct. Following a hearing on the charges, respondent terminated Vohid’s employment. Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination on the ground that, because the Hearing Officer who presided at the hearing was not designated in writing (see, Civil Service Law § 75 [2]), respondent lacked jurisdiction to maintain the disciplinary proceeding or impose sanctions against Vohid.
Supreme…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Wiggins v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Blount v. ForbesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Salley v. Hempstead School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Perez v. New York State Department of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arthur v. SoaresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Pieczonka v. JewettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Stafford v. Board of Education of Mohonasen Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Payton v. Buffalo City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002