Legal Opinion

Clinton-Dunn Telephone Co. v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1912PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from SampsoN, from order rendered by Peebles, J., ■ at chambers. Givil action in Superior Court of Sampson County to compel defendant company to restore telephone connection of plaintiff company with the local exchange of defendant company in Dunn, N. C., and supply service in that town for plaintiff and subscribers, pursuant to a contract set forth and described in tbe complaint.

Read the full summary

Appeal from SampsoN, from order rendered by Peebles, J., ■ at chambers. Givil action in Superior Court of Sampson County to compel defendant company to restore telephone connection of plaintiff company with the local exchange of defendant company in Dunn, N. C., and supply service in that town for plaintiff and subscribers, pursuant to a contract set forth and described in tbe complaint. Tbe cause was beard on a rule to show cause, obtained in term and returnable before bis Honor, R. B. Pee-bles, Judge, bolding tbe courts of tbe Sixth District, at Wilmington, N. C., on 3 Junk, 1911, and on…

1Opinion of the Court

IÍOKE, J.,

after stating tbe case: On tbe bearing it was made to appear that, in 1901, E. F. Young and wife owned and operated, for charge, a local telephone system in tbe town of Dunn, N. O., and plaintiff, a corporation acting under a <¿"was¿-public franchise, owned and operated a like system in tbe town of Clinton, N. C., and was extending its line towards Dunn. That oil 15 February of that year tbe said Young and Avife entered into a contract with plaintiff, in consideration of $10 and that plaintiff company would pay for two-thirds of tbe poles from tbe corporate line of Dunn to tbe local…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Gibbs v. Consolidated Gas Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Griffin v. Goldsboro Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  5. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership v. Carteret-Craven Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. North Carolina Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. North Carolina Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Soloman v. . Sewerage CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Walls v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API