Legal Opinion
Smith v. City of Gloucester
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 1, 1909PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
This case was heard by a judge of the Superior Court without a jury. He found for the plaintiff and reported *330the case to this court for its determination. By the terms of the report judgment is to be entered on the finding “ if the finding for the plaintiff is justified on the facts reported,” and if certain rulings and refusals to rule were correct; otherwise, judgment is to be entered for the defendant.
We understand the facts to be as follows: The plaintiff before 18,74 and since then has been the owner of a lot of land lying to the west of and abutting on Mount Vernon Street in the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Moynihan v. ToddMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Todd v. Dowd's heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Brayton v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Bates v. Inhabitants of WestboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Donohue v. City of NewburyportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Malinoski v. D. S. McGrath, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Fortier v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Ryder v. Town of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.